RFR: 8288444: Remove the workaround for frame.pack() in ModalDialogTest [v3]

[Alexander Zvegintsev]

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:09:27 GMT, Harshitha Onkar <honkar at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Previously frame.pack() was called twice as a workaround  AWT frame sizing issue in this particular test case on Windows. This issue was fixed **[JDK-8265586](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8265586)** and hence the workaround is being removed from this test.
>> 
>> PassFailJFrame is being used as the test framework. 
>> 
>> **Proposed change related to PassFailJFrame Test framework**
>> 
>> Instead of creating separate methods to handle AWT Windows as well as Frames, method signatures - [**PassFailJFrame.positionTestFrame()**](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/53b37fe1535388eb14e04c620a6b0118ed8884a0/test/jdk/java/awt/regtesthelpers/PassFailJFrame.java#L271) and [**PassFailJFrame.addTestFrame()**](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/53b37fe1535388eb14e04c620a6b0118ed8884a0/test/jdk/java/awt/regtesthelpers/PassFailJFrame.java#L294) can be changed to take in Window as input parameter instead of Frame, since Window is a superclass, this would allow the test frame to be a Window/Frame/Dialog and not be restricted to a Frame, additionally would allow proper disposal of windows added to the PassFailJFrame.
>> 
>> **Above PassFailJFrame changes tracked by: [JDK-8289238](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8289238)**
>
> Harshitha Onkar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   PassFailJFrame changes

Looks good.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by azvegint (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9286