RFR: 8294241: Deprecate URL public constructors [v2]

Jaikiran Pai jpai at openjdk.org
Sat Oct 29 11:58:26 UTC 2022


On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:24:32 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfuchs at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> How about `_unused` or `_unused1`, `_unused2` then in the meantime?
>
> I'd be happy to make the change. Let's wait to see if anybody has a better naming suggestion.

Hello Daniel, I think calling it `unused` is fine. I did a quick search in the JDK code and we already have places where we use such a variable name for similar usecase. I don't see the need for using an underscore as a prefix, but it is OK with me if you and others prefer to use it.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10874



More information about the client-libs-dev mailing list