RFR: 8306320: BufferedImage spec needs clarification w.r.t its implementation of the WritableRenderedImage interface [v2]

[Phil Race]

On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:15:24 GMT, Phil Race <prr at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Martin Desruisseaux has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Update documentation for adressing comment on pull requests, with two changes to be discussed:
>>   
>>   - The "The default implementation" sentence has not yet been removed, for reason discussed on the pull request.
>>   - The discussion about (0,0) tile indices mentions the relationship with `getTileMinX()` and `getTileMinY()`.
>
> src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/image/BufferedImage.java line 1631:
> 
>> 1629:    * {@linkplain #getRaster() single tile} without checking
>> 1630:    * the passed values. No listeners are notified since the
>> 1631:    * returned tile is always checked out for writing.
> 
> similar to above

"This method" again.

> src/java.desktop/share/classes/java/awt/image/BufferedImage.java line 1655:
> 
>> 1653:    * without checking the passed values. No listeners are notified
>> 1654:    * since the {@linkplain #getRaster() single tile} is always
>> 1655:    * checked out for writing.
> 
> similar to above

We have not quite word-for-word duplicated text here.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13506#discussion_r1177137191
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13506#discussion_r1177130655