RFR: 8307246 : Printing: banded raster path doesn't account for device offset values [v2]

Mon Dec 11 06:05:35 UTC 2023

> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX, PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.

vtstydev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:

 - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into Bugfix
 - More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX,PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030/files/347dd4d0..80623ee7

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=17030&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=17030&range=00-01

  Stats: 12027 lines in 92 files changed: 9705 ins; 2043 del; 279 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17030/head:pull/17030

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030