RFR: 8307246 : Printing: banded raster path doesn't account for device offset values [v4]
vtstydev
duke at openjdk.org
Mon Dec 11 11:41:35 UTC 2023
> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX, PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
vtstydev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional commits since the last revision:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into Bugfix
- More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX,PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop
-------------
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030/files
- new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030/files/347dd4d0..220a283b
Webrevs:
- full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=17030&range=03
- incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=17030&range=02-03
Stats: 12207 lines in 105 files changed: 9824 ins; 2063 del; 320 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17030/head:pull/17030
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030
More information about the client-libs-dev
mailing list