RFR: 8266571: Sequenced Collections

[Srikanth Adayapalam]

On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 20:36:40 GMT, Stuart Marks <smarks at openjdk.org> wrote:

> @sadayapalam
> 
> > Please include the following fix for the langtools test "failures":
> 
> OK, applying these patches lets the tests pass. I can include them in this PR.
> 
> The patch in TestJavacTaskScanner.java adjusts the expected number of elements from 158 to 170, but I note that the error message in the test failure is
> 
> ```
> java.lang.Error: #parseTypeElements higher than expected; expected 158; found: 180
> ```
> 
> The test still passes with the expected value of 170, as the criterion seems to be that the actual number be within 10% of the expected number. Since the actual number is 180, though, would it be better to use 180?

Perhaps. The fudge factor seems to be implemented to prepare for a potential move downwards as well as upwards.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/7387#issuecomment-1308300571