RFR: 8075917: The regression-swing case failed as the text on label is not painted red with the GTK L&F [v5]

Abhishek Kumar abhiscxk at openjdk.org
Wed Apr 10 11:18:13 UTC 2024


On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:22:52 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <psadhukhan at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> @aivanov-jdk 
>> 
>>> This looks weird… So you're saying Label[Enabled].textForeground and Label[Disabled].textForeground are used for Nimbus (and Synth and GTK) instead of Label.foreground and Label.disabledForeground which are used for other L&Fs.
>> 
>> As per my understanding, Yes, for Nimbus LAF the UI properties are different than other LAF.
>> 
>>> Shouldn't we fix the problem by correcting the keys instead? It looks like it's what you're doing for specific components.
>> 
>> I am not sure if it is a problem or nimbus LAF is supposed to be like this.
>> 
>>> Is it specified anywhere that Synth-based L&Fs use different constants? It results in incorrect colors.
>> 
>> Need to check on this.
>> 
>>> If a developer sets the common properties, should they override Look-and-Feel defaults?
>> 
>> Will check and revert back.
>
>> @aivanov-jdk
>> 
>> > This looks weird… So you're saying Label[Enabled].textForeground and Label[Disabled].textForeground are used for Nimbus (and Synth and GTK) instead of Label.foreground and Label.disabledForeground which are used for other L&Fs.
>> 
>> As per my understanding, Yes, for Nimbus LAF the UI properties are different than other LAF.
>> 
>> > Shouldn't we fix the problem by correcting the keys instead? It looks like it's what you're doing for specific components.
>> 
>> I am not sure if it is a problem or nimbus LAF is supposed to be like this.
>> 
>> > Is it specified anywhere that Synth-based L&Fs use different constants? It results in incorrect colors.
>> 
>> Need to check on this.
>> 
>> > If a developer sets the common properties, should they override Look-and-Feel defaults?
>> 
>> Will check and revert back.
> 
> 
> As I understood, what `Label.background` color to be set, is determined via **`Nimbus.Overrides`** property
> i.e.,  if `Label.background` is set to `Nimbus.Overrides`,  it should override the `label.setBackground()` user color setting 
> else 
> if `Nimbus.Overrides` is not set or set to null, then `Label.setBackground()` will hold precedent even if `Label.background` property is set
> 
> 
> Similarly, if `Nimbus.Overrides` is set with `Label.background` color **AND** Label[Enabled].background is also set,
> then 
> Label[Enabled].background will have priority over 
> Label.background which will have priority over
> Label.setBackground() 
> 
> but this is also controlled by another boolean property **`Nimbus.Overrides.InheritDefaults`** in way that the above precedence is valid only if if Nimbus.Overrides.InheritDefaults is true
> 
> if **`Nimbus.Overrides.InheritDefaults`** is false, then Label[Enabled].background will be ignored
> and
> Label.background will have priority over 
> Label.setBackground() 
> 
> This is somewhat explained in `https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/21/docs/api/java.desktop/javax/swing/plaf/nimbus/package-summary.html` and tested in` test/jdk/javax/swing/plaf/nimbus/ColorCustomizationTest.java` so in a way, it seems widget[state].color setting is applicable for Nimbus only since we dont have GTK.Overrides property

@prsadhuk As we discussed earlier, I checked JLabel rendering in AquaLookAndFeel. Basically, `AquaLabelUI` class doesn't override the `installDefaults` method and so the `installDefaults` method of `BasicLabelUI` class is invoked which set the foreground, background and font property through LookAndFeel and which fetch them from UIManager property.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17763#issuecomment-2047258353


More information about the client-libs-dev mailing list