RFR: 8337886: java/awt/Frame/MaximizeUndecoratedTest.java fails in OEL due to a slight color difference [v2]
Sergey Bylokhov
serb at openjdk.org
Fri Aug 16 23:32:48 UTC 2024
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 07:36:01 GMT, Manukumar V S <mvs at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> java/awt/Frame/MaximizeUndecoratedTest.java fails in OEL due to a slight color difference in the background color. This is currently reproduced only for Oracle Linux.
>>
>> The Color object I'm getting for each of these Point objects:
>> new Point(maxBounds.x + OFFSET, maxBounds.y + OFFSET) --> java.awt.Color[r=0,g=255,b=0]
>> new Point(maxBounds.width - OFFSET, maxBounds.y + OFFSET) --> java.awt.Color[r=0,g=207,b=0]
>> new Point(maxBounds.width - OFFSET, maxBounds.height - OFFSET) --> java.awt.Color[r=0,g=255,b=0]
>> new Point(maxBounds.x + OFFSET, maxBounds.height - OFFSET) --> java.awt.Color[r=0,g=255,b=0]
>>
>> So, the issue occurs for the second Point object --> new Point(maxBounds.width - OFFSET, maxBounds.y + OFFSET) - java.awt.Color[r=0,g=207,b=0]
>>
>>
>> Fix:
>> When the offset is increased from 2 to 5, it works fine in all the platforms.
>>
>> This test verifies whether the frame is maximised or not by checking its four border points(by comparing it's colour with GREEN). But in OEL, the top left and top right borders are curved, so there is a possibility of error if we directly compare those points with GREEN colour, that's why an OFFSET is needed. But an OFFSET of 2 is not sufficient for OEL, and for safety I will change it to 5. I don't see this issue in Ubuntu as the borders as rectangular there, but not curved.
>>
>> Testing:
>> Tested using mach5 in all the available platforms and it works fine everywhere(results attached in bug).
>> Tested manually in OEL 8 and 9(both x64 and aarch64) and it works fine there also.
>
> Manukumar V S has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Changing the OFFSET to a safer value 5
Marked as reviewed by serb (Reviewer).
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20486#pullrequestreview-2243743530
More information about the client-libs-dev
mailing list