RFR: 8342096: Popup menus that request focus are not shown on Linux with Wayland
Alexey Ivanov
aivanov at openjdk.org
Fri Dec 13 12:50:39 UTC 2024
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 04:16:06 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev <azvegint at openjdk.org> wrote:
> The previous [JDK-8319103](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319103) fix was not complete.
>
> The case where a menu item with a focusable component was not a direct child of a window was missing(failing the `if (window == oppositeWindow.getParent() ) {` check), so the ungrab event was posted prematurely.
>
> This can be fixed by adding `waylandWindowFocusListener` to all submenus in hierarchy.
>
> The manual test updated to use this case, and also added an automated test that checks that it didn't close prematurely.
src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/awt/UNIXToolkit.java line 532:
> 530: }
> 531: }
> 532: return false;
If you like, you may use Stream API:
Suggestion:
return Arrays.stream(window.getWindowFocusListeners())
.anyMatch(fl -> fl == waylandWindowFocusListener);
I haven't tested the code though.
src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/awt/UNIXToolkit.java line 550:
> 548: addWaylandWindowFocusListenerToWindow(oppositeWindow);
> 549: return;
> 550: }
So it's possible now that several windows in a hierarchy will have the listener added… Won't the listener be leaked? In other words, do we always remove the listener?
test/jdk/javax/swing/JPopupMenu/NestedFocusablePopupTest.java line 53:
> 51: //test is valid only when running on Wayland.
> 52: return;
> 53: }
I think it should rather throw `jtreg.SkippedException`.
With [jtreg enhancements](https://github.com/openjdk/jtreg/pull/217) and further reporting enhancements, we'll be able to see if tests aren't actually executed.
test/jdk/javax/swing/JPopupMenu/NestedFocusablePopupTest.java line 80:
> 78: if (!popupMenu.isVisible()) {
> 79: throw new RuntimeException("Popup is not visible");
> 80: }
Perhaps, you should call `popupMenu.isVisible()` on EDT?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22729#discussion_r1883879389
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22729#discussion_r1883871284
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22729#discussion_r1883884693
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22729#discussion_r1883889144
More information about the client-libs-dev
mailing list