RFR: 8307246 : Printing: banded raster path doesn't account for device offset values [v10]

[Phil Race]

On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 11:32:17 GMT, vtstydev <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX, PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
>
> vtstydev has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Remove trailing whitespace
>  - Done requested fixes 2

Revert the changes to the test which limit the pages printed out.
The test MUST print all orientations and MUST always print both opaque and alpha 
95% of the point of this test is to ensure consistency across all cases and if it doesn't test them it is mostly pointless.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030#issuecomment-1925752095