RFR: 8318603: Parallelize sun/java2d/marlin/ClipShapeTest.java [v2]
Alexey Ivanov
aivanov at openjdk.org
Thu Feb 8 11:14:54 UTC 2024
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 06:04:16 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov <serb at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The ClipShapeTest test is split into 4 different tests which could be executed in parallel.
>>
>> The execution time is changed from:
>>
>>
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>> TEST TOTAL PASS FAIL ERROR
>> jtreg:test/jdk/sun/java2d/marlin/ClipShapeTest.java
>> 1 1 0 0
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>>
>> Finished building target 'run-test' in configuration 'macosx-aarch64-server-release'
>>
>> real 2m58.673s
>> user 3m8.847s
>> sys 0m11.845s
>>
>>
>> to:
>>
>>
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>> TEST TOTAL PASS FAIL ERROR
>> jtreg:test/jdk/sun/java2d/marlin/ClipShapeTest.java
>> 4 4 0 0
>> ==============================
>> TEST SUCCESS
>>
>> Finished building target 'run-test' in configuration 'macosx-aarch64-server-release'
>>
>> real 1m17.752s
>> user 3m25.308s
>> sys 0m12.987s
>
> Sergey Bylokhov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Update ClipShapeTest.java
Marked as reviewed by aivanov (Reviewer).
I ran the test in our CI and I didn't notice an improvement. On the other hand, having separate test ids is more flexible.
test/jdk/sun/java2d/marlin/ClipShapeTest.java line 88:
> 86: * fill modes (EO rules) for paths made of either 9 lines, 4 quads, 2 cubics
> 87: * (random)
> 88: * Note: Use the argument -slow to run more intensive tests (too much time)
Suggestion:
* <p>
* Note: Use the argument {@code -slow} to run more intensive tests (too much time)
Adding <p> will render the note in a new paragraph when viewed in IDE (or on class name hover).
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17719#pullrequestreview-1869871294
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17719#issuecomment-1933856473
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17719#discussion_r1482797972
More information about the client-libs-dev
mailing list