RFR: 8307246 : Printing: banded raster path doesn't account for device offset values [v6]

[vtstydev]

> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX, PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.

vtstydev has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences compared to the previous content of the PR. The pull request contains one new commit since the last revision:

  Add test for comparing offsets of images

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030/files/58b84296..62168fb3

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=17030&range=05
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=17030&range=04-05

  Stats: 199 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 199 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/17030/head:pull/17030

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030