RFR: 8185862: AWT Assertion Failure in ::GetDIBits(hBMDC, hBM, 0, 1, 0, gpBitmapInfo, 0) 'awt_Win32GraphicsDevice.cpp', at line 185 [v2]

Christoph Langer clanger at openjdk.org
Wed Jan 31 07:29:03 UTC 2024


On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 07:23:13 GMT, Christoph Langer <clanger at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The assertions reported in the bug were observed spuriously and here and there broke tests in some Windows configurations.
>> For instance [JDK-8266129](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8266129), [JDK-8269529](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8269529) or [JDK-8323664](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8323664) came up due to this.
>> 
>> The problem is that in Windows environments without a valid display, e.g. started by system services or via PowerShell Remoting, one sees a Monitor with name 'Windisc' in `EnumDisplayMonitors`.
>> However, it seems to be some kind of a pseudo device where you can not get a DC via `CreateDC`. This behavior/monitor type doesn't seem to be well documented, though.
>> 
>> I hereby modify the device initialization code to only count/detect monitors where CreateDC returns non-NULL in Devices.cpp. I also add some more checking/error handling to AwtWin32GraphicsDevice::Initialize() for correctness.
>> 
>> Furthermore, I re-enable the test `javax/swing/reliability/HangDuringStaticInitialization.java` for Windows Debug VMs, which reverts the fix from JDK-8269529 that should not be necessary any more.
>
> Christoph Langer has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add comments

I added a comment to explain that we skip monitors where CreateDC fails.

The fix runs successfully through SAP's testing with no regressions spotted. Looks like it even fixes the problems of test/jdk/java/awt/font/GlyphVector/LayoutCompatTest.java on Windows that we reported in the comments of https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8318364.

@prrace  Want to take a look here (or assign somebody from client group)? Thanks!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17614#issuecomment-1918533151


More information about the client-libs-dev mailing list