RFR: 8307246 : Printing: banded raster path doesn't account for device offset values [v7]

[Prasanta Sadhukhan]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 06:56:58 GMT, vtstydev <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> More correct way to take in consideration nonzero PHYSICALOFFSETX, PHYSICALOFFSETY of device for banded-raster printing loop. Only on Windows platform under certain conditions real device prints shifted image on paper.
>
> vtstydev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Fix header and imports section in AlphaPrintingOffsets

I could not notice any difference related to "image" without fix and with fix as told in the test instructions. Only difference I noticed is in **margin rectangle** for "Landscape-Alpha" and "Reverse Landscape- Alpha" page 4 and 6 namely..What image difference should be looked for? I guess the instructions should be made more clearer for tester..
Attached are the printouts without the fix and with the fix

[printout-withoutfix.pdf](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/files/14108433/printout-withoutfix.pdf)

[printout-withfix.pdf](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/files/14108434/printout-withfix.pdf)

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17030#issuecomment-1918615354