RFR: JDK-8328190 : Convert AWTPanelSmoothWheel.html applet test to main [v4]

[Harshitha Onkar]

On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:01:01 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Harshitha Onkar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   minor changes
>
> test/jdk/java/awt/event/MouseEvent/AWTPanelSmoothWheel.java line 32:
> 
>> 30:  * @test
>> 31:  * @bug 6730447
>> 32:  * @summary [Win] To verify the support for high resolution mouse wheel on Windows.
> 
> This could be applicable to other platforms too, even though [JDK-6730447](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6730447) and [JDK-6524352](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6524352) are reported against Windows only. It could be than support for high-resolution mouse wheel was implemented on macOS earlier than on Windows.

I have remove @requires tag and the test is extended to all platforms.

> test/jdk/java/awt/event/MouseEvent/AWTPanelSmoothWheel.java line 49:
> 
>> 47:             below the instruction window.
>> 48:             Please make sure that some of the messages have non-zero 'wheelRotation' value,
>> 49:             and also check if the test works OK if the mouse wheel is rotated very slow.
> 
> Shall we increase the width of the instruction window so that less horizontal scrolling is needed?
> 
> The test can actually verify the condition without help from the user. The handler for `MouseWheelListener` could well look into the `MouseWheelEvent` and verify _automatically_ if `scrollType=WHEEL_UNIT_SCROLL` and there are any events with `wheelRotation=1` (or rather `wheelRotation!=0`).
> 
> You can even `forcePass` the test as soon as you detected few events which satisfy the condition.
> 
> If you don't see events with `scrollType=WHEEL_UNIT_SCROLL`, then the mouse doesn't support high-resolution scrolling.

@aivanov-jdk Semi-automated the test, it now passes when 5 or more  MouseWheelEvent of type: scrollType=WHEEL_UNIT_SCROLL & wheelRotation != 0 is recorded. Updated the instructions accordingly.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18312#discussion_r1531080738
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18312#discussion_r1531078089