RFR: JDK-8328398 : Convert java/awt/im/4490692/bug4490692.html applet test to main [v2]

[Alexander Zvegintsev]

On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 16:59:47 GMT, Harshitha Onkar <honkar at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Following test is converted from applet to main using PassFailJFrame.
>> 
>> The original test had ignore tag - **The fix for this problem was backed out for 5057184.  Remove this "ignore" tag when it is fixed again.**
>> I believe this was fixed and the test works correctly on Linux platforms, hence ignore tag has been removed.
>> 
>> This is a semi-automated test, the first check is manual and the 2nd one is automated. Details in the test instructions.
>
> Harshitha Onkar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   instruction line length

test/jdk/java/awt/im/bug4490692.java line 74:

> 72:                 .rows((int) INSTRUCTIONS.lines().count() + 2)
> 73:                 .columns(40)
> 74:                 .testUI(() -> new TestFrame("Test Accented Chars"))

Looks like a good candidate to use `splitUIRight/Bottom` (up to you).

test/jdk/java/awt/im/bug4490692.java line 95:

> 93:     @Override
> 94:     public void keyPressed(KeyEvent e) {
> 95:         if (e.getKeyCode() == 23 || e.getKeyCode() == 60) {

>  CASE 2: This step is automated and applicable for both
keyboards - LINUX & SOLARIS SPARC.
When Tab key is pressed it should generate a-acute (à)
character, this test automatically passes if the correct character
is generated on keypress else fails.

Unfortunately this check doesn't work for me:
`java.awt.event.KeyEvent[KEY_PRESSED,keyCode=0,keyText=Unknown keyCode: 0x0,keyChar='á',keyLocation=KEY_LOCATION_UNKNOWN,rawCode=23,primaryLevelUnicode=225,scancode=0,extendedKeyCode=0x10000e1] on javax.swing.JTextField...`

The `keycode` is 0, `rawCode` is desired `23`, but we can't get it it unless parsing the output of `e.toString()`

The `e.getKeyChar() == 0x00e1` check is still valid thought.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18402#discussion_r1533782803
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18402#discussion_r1533787428