RFR: 8353230: Emoji rendering regression after JDK-8208377

[Daniel Gredler]

On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:28:12 GMT, Nikita Gubarkov <ngubarkov at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> It looks like this regression actually fits into a longer series of fixes / regressions in this area:
>> 
>> - [JDK-4517298](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-4517298) fixed metrics for zero-width characters, but broke some ligatures / glyph substitutions
>> - [JDK-7017058](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7017058) fixed the ligatures / glyph substitutions, but broke some zero-width metrics
>> - [JDK-8208377](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8208377) fixed some metrics and rendering for zero-width characters, but broke some ligatures / glyph substitutions
>> - Now, with this PR, we aim to fix the ligatures without re-breaking zero-width metrics and display
>> 
>> We have two different types of use cases pulling `CharToGlyphMapper` in two different directions: the users who need raw, untransformed glyph info, and the users who need normalized / transformed glyph info.
>> 
>> It looks to me like, in the current code base, the only `CharToGlyphMapper` user which requires raw font data is HarfBuzz (explicitly confirmed with the HarfBuzz team here: https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/discussions/5234).
>> 
>> The regression mechanism at play here is that the HarfBuzz font callbacks are currently providing HarfBuzz with transformed glyph info (e.g. ZWJ -> INVISIBLE_GLYPH_ID), which prevents HarfBuzz from recognizing and applying the correct font GSUB substitutions (which involve ZWJ).
>> 
>> In order to fix this without (yet again) breaking metrics and display behavior elsewhere, I've added two methods to `CharToGlyphMapper` which provide access to raw glyph info, to be used by the HarfBuzz font callbacks: `charToGlyphRaw(int)` and `charToVariationGlyphRaw(int)`.
>> 
>> Note two intricacies related to `CompositeGlyphMapper`:
>> 1. We need to be careful to only cache raw (untransformed) values, to avoid conflicts between requests for a raw version of a glyph and a transformed version of the same glyph. Another option would have been two separate caches, but I don't think that's necessary.
>> 2. Consumers who are using `CompositeGlyphMapper.SLOTMASK` to check glyph slots (e.g. `FontRunIterator` and `CTextPipe`) will "see" invisible glyphs as having come from slot 0. This isn't new, and I think it's OK, but something to be aware of.
>> 
>> The glyph cache handling in `CCharToGlyphMapper` (for macOS) also requires care to avoid mixing value types.
>> 
>> Please also note that I'm not sure if the tweak to `sunFont.c` is being tested, since FFM is being used by default for Harf...
>
> We had similar emoji-related regressions at JetBrains. Although our font-related code diverged from OpenJDK a bit, porting this patch seems to resolve them too. I am not an OpenJDK reviewer, but LGTM nevertheless.

@YaaZ Thanks for the information!

@prrace Have you had a chance to look at this PR?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24412#issuecomment-2819107922