RFR: 8364434: Inconsistent BufferedContext state after GC [v3]
Alexey Ushakov
avu at openjdk.org
Fri Aug 8 14:22:15 UTC 2025
On Thu, 7 Aug 2025 12:06:02 GMT, Nikita Gubarkov <ngubarkov at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> For "true" null objects, reset the ref itself to null. Non-null ref with null content means that the object was GC'ed. GC'ed state always behaves as not-equal to the new one, causing corresponding ops to be written into RQ.
>>
>> Although I could not find practical scenarios where refs other than `validPaintRef` could cause problems, this is generally fragile and potentially problematic for any state object kept in weak ref. Therefore I changed the usage of all weak refs in the same way.
>
> Nikita Gubarkov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> 8364434: Inconsistent BufferedContext state after GC
>
> Old copyright year left from the test I copied
Marked as reviewed by avu (Committer).
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26576#pullrequestreview-3101040335
More information about the client-libs-dev
mailing list