RFR: 8158801: [TEST_BUG] Mixing tests fail because of focus workaround trick [v44]
Alexey Ivanov
aivanov at openjdk.org
Thu Dec 11 18:51:44 UTC 2025
On Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:05:11 GMT, Khalid Boulanouare <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Many Mixing tests failed because the work around click lands on the minimizing area in the window control and causes the tests to fail.
>>
>> This fix changes the width of base frames which allows most of tests to pass.
>
> Khalid Boulanouare has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 66 additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jdk-8158801
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jdk-8158801
> - Removes uncessary import and adds blank lines between import blocks
> - Makes inherited method final
> - Removes unnecessary URL
> - Fixes a typo
> - Removes unncessary boolean variable, line and import
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jdk-8158801
> - Cleans up code for move visibility
> - Cleans up code and adds missed import
> - ... and 56 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/98b872f3...59a937ac
A few more formatting suggestions.
test/jdk/java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/GlassPaneOverlappingTestBase.java line 97:
> 95:
> 96: @Override
> 97: protected final boolean isMultiFramesTest(){
Suggestion:
protected final boolean isMultiFramesTest() {
Space between the closing parenthesis and the opening brace.
test/jdk/java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/GlassPaneOverlappingTestBase.java line 139:
> 137:
> 138: @Override
> 139: protected void cleanup(){
Suggestion:
protected void cleanup() {
test/jdk/java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/JPopupMenuOverlapping.java line 69:
> 67: frame.setVisible(false);
> 68: }
> 69: frame = new JFrame("Mixing : Dropdown Overlapping test");
Should the old frame be disposed of instead of just hidden?
Is it even possible that `frame` is not `null`?
test/jdk/java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/OpaqueOverlapping.java line 65:
> 63: }
> 64: private String testSeq;
> 65: private final static String checkSeq = "010000101";
Suggestion:
private static final String checkSeq = "010000101";
Sort modifiers? (Not required.)
-------------
Changes requested by aivanov (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25971#pullrequestreview-3568531235
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25971#discussion_r2611453185
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25971#discussion_r2611461395
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25971#discussion_r2611646793
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25971#discussion_r2611674866
More information about the client-libs-dev
mailing list