RFR: 8305915: java/awt/Frame/FrameLocation/FrameLocation.java fails with "The frame location is wrong!" [v4]

[Tejesh R]

On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 10:40:19 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> I tested SizeMinimizedTest.java running in CI and no failure is observed. It's true that I had added the test for different bug ID long time which is wrong. Should we just move it to another JBS and PL it while removing 8305915 PL ? I guess we should handle both the issue separately with different BugID ?
>> 
>> At the very least, this info should be added to the current JBS issue. Maybe update the title and the summary of the issue to also include the removal of `SizeMinimizedTest.java` from the PL.
>
>> > As @DamonGuy mentioned, a better way to deal with [JDK-8305915](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305915) could be closing it as _Cannot reproduce_ and submitting a new bug to update `FrameLocation.java` and remove `SizeMinimizedTest.java` from the problem list.
>> 
>> Probably I'll capture screenshot on failure and deproblemlist it. If I close the bug as _Cannot reproduce_ then it remains in problem listing, so better way is to de-problemlist it and add screen capture.
> 
> That's the point—you cannot reproduce the failure of `FrameLocation.java`, can you?
> 
> Thus, the correct resolution is *Cannot Reproduce*.
> 
> Adding a screenshot is not fixing the failure reported in [JDK-8305915](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305915), it's an improvement for the test to have the more information to analyse the failure if it occurs again. This is why it's a new issue.
> 
> 8305915 has to be removed from the PL, submit a new bug, or rather create a subtask of JDK-8305915, to remove both `FrameLocation.java` and `SizeMinimizedTest.java` from the problem list.
> 
> I strongly believe this approach creates a clearer bug history in JBS and clearer changelog in the JDK. This also makes backporting easier as well as dealing with test failures in older releases.
> 
> Yes, submitting two new bugs creates more work but we're not in a rush here, and I think *it's worth the time*.
> 
> I can submit the bugs for you if you prefer so.

@aivanov-jdk @DamonGuy I've raised https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/27678 PR for de-problemlisting the main bug. Once this is integrated, I'll close the main bug as "Not-Reproducible".

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27366#issuecomment-3377713390