RFR: 8360498: [TEST_BUG] Some Mixing test continue to fail [v18]
Alexey Ivanov
aivanov at openjdk.org
Fri Feb 13 19:35:20 UTC 2026
On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:48:28 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Khalid Boulanouare has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 37 commits:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'pr/25971' into jdk-8360498
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jdk-8360498
>> - Resolves confict for when there is a merge with jdk-8158801
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jdk-8360498
>> - Removes not needed changes
>> - Revert "Removes not needed changes"
>>
>> This reverts commit e76780d50cc390e35443dccb193cfbc9a1cec1cb.
>> - Removes not needed changes
>> - Removes extra white lines
>> - Merge branch 'pr/25971' into jdk-8360498
>> - Merge branch 'pr/25971' into jdk-8360498
>> - ... and 27 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/59a937ac...900a7943
>
> test/jdk/java/awt/Mixing/AWT_Mixing/MixingPanelsResizing.java line 85:
>
>> 83: try {
>> 84: Process p = Runtime.getRuntime()
>> 85: .exec(JAVA_HOME + "/bin/java FrameBorderCounter");
>
> Did I already asked this question?
>
> Why can't the code in `FrameBorderCounter` be run in the same JVM? I'm pretty sure it can be.
>
> It's like for a separate refactoring, yet I'd like to have a tracking bug for getting rid of launching another process to count something that can be done by executing `FrameBorderCounter.main` directly and ensuring the frame is disposed of.
I've submitted [JDK-8377916](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8377916): *Run `FrameBorderCounter` in-process in `AWT_Mixing` tests*.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26625#discussion_r2805606386
More information about the client-libs-dev
mailing list