Alternative syntax for closures

[Neal Gafter]

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Rémi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:

> I've just written a blog about an alternative syntax:
> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/forax/archive/2008/07/alternative_syn.html


That's nice, but it doesn't really help evaluate this alternative.

If your proposal, I see you use, but don't define, the syntax for function
types. I see you allow referring to a method by its simple name as a
closure, but I don't know what name lookup rules you have in mind that would
make that possible.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/closures-dev/attachments/20080707/df806942/attachment.html