Alternative syntax for closures

[Neal Gafter]

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Rémi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:

> Furthermore, i don't like exception type parameter, too complex too, that
> why i've proposed
> a different syntax for method that takes an unrestricted closure, this
> allow to
> perform exception transparency seamlessly and avoid create a type for
> unrestricted function type
> (like T... which is only available in method declaration).


I'd love to see the semantic rules that you have in mind to achieve
exception transparency.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/closures-dev/attachments/20080708/115bb59b/attachment.html