Closures for Java (0.6) specification part b
Jonathan Gibbons
Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM
Mon Dec 14 11:20:02 PST 2009
Neal,
As much as I like control flow abstraction, it seems that your proposal
0.6b leaves us in a half-way house with respect to control flow
keywords. Using the 'for' modifier, 'break' and 'continue' get to work
as expected, but it would appear that 'return' is still local to the
lambda function, which is mildly icky. Have you considered this issue?
-- Jon
More information about the closures-dev
mailing list