Control Invocation Syntax++

[Peter Levart]

It's interesting to see how same ideas are re-instantiated again and again.

I, for example, was inspired by Neal's comments that "Control Invocation Syntax" in 0.6b is not enough for all problems and the fact that I programmed in Objective-C a long ago...

Peter

P.S.

But I didn't notice the problem about ambiguity at first. This is a no-go without complicating method resolution any further.


On Friday 18 December 2009 15:45:15 Neal Gafter wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Stefan Schulz <schulz at the-loom.de> wrote:
> 
> > Coin will not accept new proposals, as Joe lately said again.
> > But you might be interested in a little blog post of mine from some years
> > ago:
> > http://jroller.com/jadda/entry/multipiece_method_names
> >
> 
> I'll second that with my own ancient historical post: <
> http://gafter.blogspot.com/2007/01/methodnamesinpieces.html>.
>