Boxing function types

[Neal Gafter]

On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com> wrote:

> I'd love to hear you expand on this.  I can't imagine what you might want
> to change in the core language's exception checking rules.  I've done some
> language design to support asynchrony, and it transposes to Java very nicely
> assuming you have support for disjunctive types (exception transparency).
>

Regarding the async language support I've been working on, see the video
http://microsoftpdc.com/Sessions/FT11 from about 40:05 to 52:00.  This is
asynchrony in the coroutine sense, which I suspect is not what you have in
mind.

Cheers,
Neal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/closures-dev/attachments/20091129/9bc67fff/attachment.html