RFR: CODETOOLS-7901672: trees extension broken after upgrade to mercurial 3.8.1

Tim Bell tim.bell at oracle.com
Thu Jun 1 03:59:11 UTC 2017


Jon, Erik -

> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/CODETOOLS-7901672/webrev.02/trees.py.html

One additional fix to correct a typo before pushing:

line 868:
  @command('tdefapth')

should be:
  @command('tdefpath')

Tim

On 05/31/17 08:13, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Magnus,
>
> Will push this later today.
>
> -- Jon
>
>
> On 5/31/17 1:36 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> On 2017-05-31 10:20, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Thanks for looking at this!
>>>
>>> I have renamed run_command to command_cmd. I agree the naming should
>>> be consistent.
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/CODETOOLS-7901672/webrev.02/
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>>
>> Jon, can you push Erik's patch?
>>
>> /Magnus
>>
>>>
>>> /Erik
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-05-17 12:30, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>>> Looks good to me. Thanks for fixing this!
>>>>
>>>> A minor nit:
>>>>
>>>> +# This function cannot be named "command" since it clashes with the
>>>> @command
>>>> +# decorator.
>>>> + at command('tcommand|tcmd')
>>>> +def run_command(ui, repo, cmd, *args, **opts):
>>>>
>>>> +# This function cannot be named list since it clashes with the
>>>> python builtin
>>>> + at command('tlist')
>>>> +def list_cmd(ui, repo, **opts):
>>>>
>>>> Maybe use a more consistent naming scheme? E.g. rename the first
>>>> command_cmd? But I'm ok if you want to keep the run_command name as
>>>> well.
>>>>
>>>> /Magnus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-04-18 19:35, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>>>> The way a Mercurial plugin interacts with Mercurial has changed
>>>>> over time. The technique used in trees has been deprecated for a
>>>>> while and in 3.8, it no longer works.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a patch that adopts the new method using decorators,
>>>>> introduced in Mercurial 1.9. It also contains a fallback workaround
>>>>> that keeps compatibility with older versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> For trees, there are further complications for versions between 1.9
>>>>> and 3.1 which the patch also handles. I have run the automatic
>>>>> tests for all versions from 1.1 to latest as well as manually using
>>>>> it with various versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7901672
>>>>>
>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/CODETOOLS-7901672/webrev.01/
>>>>>
>>>>> /Erik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>



More information about the code-tools-dev mailing list