RFR: CODETOOLS-7901672: trees extension broken after upgrade to mercurial 3.8.1
Jonathan Gibbons
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Thu Jun 8 18:02:41 UTC 2017
Note to self ... I still have to apply the fix for the typo that Tim
noticed. I'll do that now.
-- Jon
On 06/08/2017 05:04 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>
> On 2017-06-03 03:23, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Pushed.
>
> Thank you! :-)
>
> /Magnus
>
>>
>> -- Jon
>>
>> On 05/31/2017 01:36 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> On 2017-05-31 10:20, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for looking at this!
>>>>
>>>> I have renamed run_command to command_cmd. I agree the naming
>>>> should be consistent.
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/CODETOOLS-7901672/webrev.02/
>>>
>>> Looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Jon, can you push Erik's patch?
>>>
>>> /Magnus
>>>
>>>>
>>>> /Erik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-05-17 12:30, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>>>> Looks good to me. Thanks for fixing this!
>>>>>
>>>>> A minor nit:
>>>>>
>>>>> +# This function cannot be named "command" since it clashes with
>>>>> the @command
>>>>> +# decorator.
>>>>> + at command('tcommand|tcmd')
>>>>> +def run_command(ui, repo, cmd, *args, **opts):
>>>>>
>>>>> +# This function cannot be named list since it clashes with the
>>>>> python builtin
>>>>> + at command('tlist')
>>>>> +def list_cmd(ui, repo, **opts):
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe use a more consistent naming scheme? E.g. rename the first
>>>>> command_cmd? But I'm ok if you want to keep the run_command name
>>>>> as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Magnus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2017-04-18 19:35, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>>>>> The way a Mercurial plugin interacts with Mercurial has changed
>>>>>> over time. The technique used in trees has been deprecated for a
>>>>>> while and in 3.8, it no longer works.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a patch that adopts the new method using decorators,
>>>>>> introduced in Mercurial 1.9. It also contains a fallback
>>>>>> workaround that keeps compatibility with older versions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For trees, there are further complications for versions between
>>>>>> 1.9 and 3.1 which the patch also handles. I have run the
>>>>>> automatic tests for all versions from 1.1 to latest as well as
>>>>>> manually using it with various versions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7901672
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Webrev:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/CODETOOLS-7901672/webrev.01/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Erik
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the code-tools-dev
mailing list