Points about language support for 292

[Paul Benedict]

John,

>>Although I doubted at first, I now agree (with Alex, Neal, et al) that
>>where JSR 292 punches into the JLS, it should not bring a new loophole
>>in the static checking of throws and catches.

When a language feature "punches into the JLS", isn't it mandatory
those features exist in the java.lang namespace? Perhaps this was
discussed before (and I missed it), but I hope "java.dyn" migrates
into "java.lang.dyn" due to its effect on the JLS.

Paul