Feedback and comments on ARM proposal
Neal Gafter
neal at gafter.com
Tue Mar 10 09:18:21 PDT 2009
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Tim Peierls <tim at peierls.net> wrote:
> the coin-dev list has yet to
> come up with an example where ARM support is both appropriate and difficult
> to provide under the proposal.
We identified a whole pile of them. java.awt.Graphics,
org.eclipse.swt.graphic.Path, java.nio.channels.FileLock,
org.ietf.jgss.GSSCredential, and java.awt.image.VolatileImage to pick
a few.
> Getting a little OT: If you're using Lock.lock() and Lock.unlock()
> exclusively now, unless you are using Conditions, you might as well just use
> regular built-in synchronization. Your code will be easier to understand.
Easier to understand, but unfortunately incorrect. I use Lock where
fairness is required.
More information about the coin-dev
mailing list