PROPOSAL: Method and Field Literals

[Roel Spilker]

Oh yes, you're right.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jesse Wilson <jesse at swank.ca> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Roel Spilker <r.spilker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Secondly, the proposal only allows Field and Method literals that are
>> visible to the caller. But my experience is that I use reflection often to
>> access private members of other classes. So more false positives in the
>> search results.
>
>
> No, non-visible members aren't included in these search results.
> Class.getMethod() returns only public methods.
>