PROPOSAL: Method and Field Literals

[Rémi Forax]

Neal Gafter a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Rémi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
>   
>> Neal,
>> I don't know if you will regret saying this but
>> I will regret to not saying that  it will create lot of puzzlers like this
>> one:
>>
>> class A {
>>  static int f(int) { ... }
>> }
>> ...
>> {int => int} c=A#f(int);
>> A#f(int).equals(c)             // false because A#f(int) is a
>> java.lang.reflect.Method
>>     
>
> It's hard for me to imagine how to turn this into a "real" puzzler
> rather than just a curiosity.  How do you imagine a programmer could
> get "bitten" by this?
>   

Come on, implicit conversion rules always creates a mismatch between 
what the compiler does
and what the developer think.

Here, I just alias an expression, why the result is not true.

Rémi