PROPOSAL: Elvis operator

[Stephen Colebourne]

Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I'm re-submitting the Elvis operator as a separate proposal to ensure it 
> is treated as such. So far I've not heard any arguments against this on 
> this list, and there are lots of positives.

To be absolutely clear - the original proposal "Elvis and other 
null-safe operators" remains alive, I haven't revoked it. The purpose of 
this proposal today is to allow Elvis to be considered on its own, and 
in addition to the combination of Elvis and null-safe access.

Stephen