Tiny update to Improved Exception Handling: @SuppressWarnings
Roel Spilker
r.spilker at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 01:38:16 PDT 2009
I prefer
catch (@SuppressWarnings("unthrown") IOException e) {}
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot <
reinier at zwitserloot.com> wrote:
> If the suggestion to remove the requirement that catch blocks are
> reachable is accepted, I suggest such code should still generate a
> warning. You can put @SuppressWarnings on the exception block, like so:
>
> try {
> int x = 5 + 5;
> } catch ( @SuppressWarnings("unreachable") IOException
> iDontOccurInTryBlock) {
> //whatever
> }
>
>
> Perhaps the notion that the compiler will presume that annotation is
> referring to the catch block should be added to the proposal.
>
>
> --Reinier Zwitserloot (on behalf of Roel Spilker, who came up with
> this).
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the coin-dev
mailing list