PROPOSAL: open and close brace optional for single statement try, catch, finally, method declaration
Tom Hawtin
Thomas.Hawtin at Sun.COM
Mon Mar 30 09:28:29 PDT 2009
Neal Gafter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Tom Hawtin <Thomas.Hawtin at sun.com> wrote:
>> I think that is inappropriately pedantic. JLS 3rd Ed, 14.5/p368: 'the if
>> statement of the Java programming language suffers from the so-called
>> "dangling else problme,".' I don't know how parser implementations tend to
>> handle the issue.
>
> Parser implementations tend to handle the issue by following the
> grammar in the JLS, which is not ambiguous. See the discussion
> following your quote.
A reason why I wasn't sure is that there are two Java grammars in the
JLS. The (non-normative, IIRC) Chapter 18/p585 states:
"The grammar presented piecemeal in the preceding chapters is much
better for exposition, but it is not well suited as a basis for a
parser. The grammar presented in this chapter is the basis for the
reference implementation."
The grammer contains:
Statement:
if ParExpression Statement [else Statement]
I believe that causes an ambiguity.
Are the quoted statements dated, wrong or something else?
Tom Hawtin
More information about the coin-dev
mailing list