Notes on implementing concise calls to constructors with type parameters

[Mark Derricutt]

If you were going to use this syntax, why not be somewhat consistent with
the dynamic language folk and go for:

def foo = new ArrayList<String>();


Visually I find it more logical to read it this way.

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Howard Lovatt <howard.lovatt at iee.org>wrote:

> ArrayList<String> foo = new();



-- 
Discouragement is a dissatisfaction with the past, a distaste for the
present, and a distrust of the future
- Maree De Jong, Life NZ.

blog: http://www.talios.com
podcast: http://www.illegalargument.com
skype / twitter: talios
Sent from Auckland, Auk, New Zealand