StringBuffer/Builder vs Collection Access

[Ruslan Shevchenko]

 Thanks for corrections.  Will be included in v6.

Regards !

>
> I note that these results don't seem to include the constructs "SV +=
> SE" or "SV = SV + SE" where SV is a String variable and SE is a String
> expression. These constructs would also be candidates for replacement
> with the new StringBuilder/StringBuffer operators.
>
> Also, any calls to "SBE.setLength(0)" where SBE is an expression of
> type StringBuffer or StringBuilder could be replaced with 'SBE = ""'
> under the current proposal.
>
> Also, any code like "SB foo = new SB();" or "SB foo=new SB(SE)" could
> be replaced with "SB foo = SE" under the current proposal (where SB is
> StringBuffer or StringBuilder and SE is a string expression).
>
> Thanks again for your time spent researching this!
>
> Derek
>
>
> On May 17, 2009, at 11:40 PM, "Ruslan Shevchenko"
> <rssh at gradsoft.com.ua> wrote:
>
>>
>> Also partial results, full data later:
>>
>> Under simplicified collection element access i understand call of
>> Collection.get or List.set or Map.put
>>
>> Under simplicified StringBuilder/Buffer append: call of
>> StringBuilder.append or StringBuffer.append
>>
>>
>> jetty:
>> simplicified collection element access  :       241
>> simplicified StringBuilder/Buffer syntax        :       363
>>
>> gwt-user:
>> simplicified collection element access  :       324
>> simplicified StringBuilder/Buffer syntax        :       216
>>
>> hibernate:
>> simplicified collection element access  :       613
>> simplicified StringBuilder/Buffer syntax        :       1128
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>