Huston, we have a problem !

[Maurizio Cimadamore]

On 18/02/11 15:46, "Zdeněk Troníček" wrote:
> Maurizio, this is not good example because the first call is not correct
> here. So, if it does not compile it should not be wrong even if it
> compiled under previous version.
What is wrong about the following code?

Foo f1 = new Foo(1).get("");


Maurizio
> And hopefully you do not want to drive the language design by a
> requirement to be source compatible with sources which are apparently
> wrong.
>
> Z.