Documentation of Project Coin features as implemented in the JDK 7 developer preview
Joe Darcy
joe.darcy at oracle.com
Wed Mar 9 09:37:14 PST 2011
Hello.
As noted in subsequent discussion, the "diamond operator" isn't really
an operator and we have taken to not referring to it as such. For
consistency, I think it is fine to allow (but discourage) extra white
space between the "<" and ">" characters of a diamond. I find this
similar to the allowable white space between the "@" and type name of
an annotation.
Cheers,
-Joe
Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
> On 09/03/11 12:57, Ulf Zibis wrote:
>
>> Why do you allow whitespace between the "<" and">" of a diamond.
>>
> Good catch - I don't think this is a spec problem, as the grammar for
> diamond is defined as follows in the latest draft:
>
> /TypeArgumentsOrDiamond:/
>
> /TypeArguments/
>
> |<||>|
>
>
> So it is more a compiler bug erroneously accepting spaces 'inside' the
> diamond. The compiler should be fixed.
>
> Maurizio
>
>> Is whitespace allowed for ++ operator e.g.?
>>
>> -Ulf
>>
>>
>> Am 09.03.2011 07:40, schrieb Joe Darcy:
>>
>>> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> I've posted documentation of the semantics of the Project Coin
>>>> features as implemented in the JDK 7 developer preview, b130, at:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/ProjectCoin/ProjectCoin-Documentation-v0.83.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Before sending in comments or questions about a feature to coin-dev,
>>>> please read the discussion section after a feature. Many design
>>>> considerations are discussed in those sections. Additionally, some
>>>> known bugs in the current implementation are noted in the text. In
>>>> particular, javac in the JDK 7 developer preview erroneously accepts
>>>> diamond combined with non-generic classes and accepts some uses of
>>>> diamond with anonymous inner classes. These bugs will be corrected in
>>>> future builds.
>>>>
>>>> Happy reading,
>>>>
>>>> -Joe
>>>>
>>> No comments from the coin-dev readership on the posted documentation?
>>>
>>> -Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
More information about the coin-dev
mailing list