651779, 6502392 & 6502395: Annotation processing bugs

[Jonathan Gibbons]

Emil,

Thank you for your offer; I will check up on your SCA for you.

The first bug number you gave is invalid; I'm guessing you mean
6517779.   I don't believe anyone is working on any of those issues.

-- Jon


On Dec 10, 2008, at 1:25 AM, Emil Siemes wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I thought it might be more important than ever to start
> collaborating and supporting openjdk now.
>
> I would like to volunteer for fixing annotation processing
> bugs like 651779, 6502392 & 6502395. Anyone already working
> on them?
>
> I sent in a signed SCA by mail 10 days ago but haven't yet got any
> feedback. Is that ok, or might the mail be lost?
>
> Thanks and best Regards
>   Emil
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20081210/20ae2991/attachment.html