langtools: no more warnings
Jonathan Gibbons
Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM
Fri Jan 30 08:07:00 PST 2009
Both cleanup patches and real bug fixes are good. Reducing the
unnecessary warnings makes it easier to see the significant ones.
Experience says we're unlikely to be overwhelmed by the cleanup
patches ;-)
-- Jon
On Jan 30, 2009, at 7:59 AM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/1/30 Jonathan Gibbons <Jonathan.Gibbons at sun.com>:
>> For those that didn't notice the fine print, a recent push to the
>> langtools
>> repository [1] finally raised the quality bar on the langtools
>> repository.
>> That push fixed (or suppressed) the remaining outstanding warnings
>> in the
>> repository, and enabled -Xlint:all -Werror.
>>
>> Now, if only the other repositories could do the same...
>>
>> -- Jon
>>
>> [1]
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2009-January/000873.html
>>
>
> We already had such a bug request for some of the JDK C code:
>
> http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=289
>
> I just hope we're not going to be mired in cleanup patches as opposed
> to real bug fixes.
> --
> Andrew :-)
>
> IcedTea/OpenJDK Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> Support Free Java!
> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
> http://openjdk.java.net
>
> PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
> Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list