hg: jdk7/tl/langtools: 6979683: inconsistent interaction of reference cast with box/unbox conversions leaves out a useful case
Ulf Zibis
Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de
Thu Sep 2 16:13:48 PDT 2010
Much thanks.
-Ulf
Am 03.09.2010 01:04, schrieb Neal Gafter:
> No, it means that a single cast can't apply multiple conversions from the list of conversions that
> a cast is allowed to do. It can only do one of the bullets in that bulleted list. Programmers
> can use multiple casts.
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Ulf Zibis <Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de <mailto:Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de>> wrote:
>
> Am 02.09.2010 21:07, schrieb Neal Gafter:
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:54 PM, John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com
>> <mailto:john.r.rose at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> (Yes, I agree the spec. is gray here. There is an umbrella proposal to bring clarity to
>> it, mentioned in the final paragraph of my bug report.)
>>
>>
>> It isn't gray. Combined conversions are not intended to be allowed.
>>
>
> Does that mean, that following code is not allowed (see: Bug ID: 6775385 NPE caused by
> ConditionalExpression and auto-boxing failure
> <http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6775385>):
>
> Map<Character,Byte> c2bExistents = new HashMap();
> char c = '\u20ac';
> char directEnd = '\u0080';
> Byte exsistent = c< directEnd ? (Byte)(byte)(c) : c2bExistents.get(c);
>
> Workaround looks pretty ugly:
>
> Map<Character,Byte> c2bExistents = new HashMap();
> char c = '\u20ac';
> char directEnd = '\u0080';
> Byte exsistent;
> if (c< directEnd)
> exsistent = (byte)(c);
> else
> exsistent = c2bExistents.get(c);
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20100903/b3c60113/attachment.html
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list