8003512: javac doesn't work with jar files with >64k entries
Jonathan Gibbons
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Thu Dec 20 14:33:34 PST 2012
This is a good suggestion, but does open up the discussion of standard
naming for properties. java6.home is OK for now, but we might want to
consider a context (faq, tag spec etc) to define standard properties or
env variables like this.
-- Jon
On 12/20/2012 10:14 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Looks good to me.
> The one thing I might change is a jtreg design question. I wouldn't
> bother with T8003512.doTest, but simply run the test whenever the
> java6.home system property is defined.
> This means people can have scripts to RUN ALL THE TESTS without having
> to keep adding new test-specific system properties all the time.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Vicente Arturo Romero Zaldivar
> <vicente.romero at oracle.com <mailto:vicente.romero at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for your comments. have generated a new webrev after them,
> here is the link for it:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/8003512/webrev.01/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Evromero/8003512/webrev.01/>
>
>
> Vicente.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: martinrb at google.com <mailto:martinrb at google.com>
> To: vicente.romero at oracle.com <mailto:vicente.romero at oracle.com>
> Cc: compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net
> <mailto:compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Sent: Thursday, 20 December, 2012 12:09:28 AM GMT +00:00 GMT
> Britain, Ireland, Portugal
> Subject: Re: 8003512: javac doesn't work with jar files with >64k
> entries
>
> Thanks for productionizing my half-baked change.
> Looks pretty good.
> The test is pretty annoying, but I think the current strategy of
> passing system properties is as good as we're going to get.
>
> + } catch (Exception ex) {
> + throw new AssertionError(
> + "The test has failed while executing this command " + command,
> + ex.getCause());
> + }
> +
>
> I would just let executeCommand throw naturally and cause the test
> to fail. Kill the conversion to AssertionError.
>
> ---
>
> + * -javaoption:-Djava6="/path/to/jdk_or_jre6/bin/java"
>
> It's possible other tests may end up using the same mechanism to
> specify some other jdk.
> (I'm thinking cross-version serialization tests)
> Perhaps better is to specify the root of a jdk so that other tests
> might reuse it.
> Perhaps -javaoption:-Djava6.home=
>
> Martin
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Vicente Arturo Romero Zaldivar
> <vicente.romero at oracle.com <mailto:vicente.romero at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is the webrev for bug (8003512: javac doesn't work with
> jar files with >64k entries):
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/8003512/webrev.00/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Evromero/8003512/webrev.00/>
>
> Apologies for sending a non-public link before.
>
> Vicente.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20121220/9d98de9e/attachment.html
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list