clarification: Class file changes and pack200.
Kumar Srinivasan
kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com
Mon Feb 11 11:44:44 PST 2013
Hello Eric, Alex,
I have no objections to the proposed MethodParameters, my understanding
at this time is that the MethodParameters may have more elements, that
is fine
from a pack200 perspective.
Also the flag type is being changed from u4 to u2, I will need to adjust
this on
the pack200 spec. and the implementation as well, pack200 is very strongly
typed.
Since MP attr is generated via a flag, it does not cause any problems for
pack200, however the pack200 tests do rely on com/sun/tools/javac/classfile.
What this generally means to any javac developer making changes to the
back end,
is that:
1. new class file spec. be submitted to ccc, and cc me on the
submission, I have also
asked Joe to keep me in the loop if such changes come to ccc's
attention.
2. run the pack200 regression tests in jdk/test/tools/pack200,
if there are failures, please file a bug and assign the bug to me.
Any failures left unfixed and/or disabled, can cause other issues
to escape
into the JDK, spreading to other repositories, causing build
failures.
I hope this clarifies.
Thanks
Kumar
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list