Review request: update javac to properly output mandated parameters in MethodParameters attributes

[Maurizio Cimadamore]

On 12/02/13 14:53, Eric McCorkle wrote:
> No, actually, that variant has to be there in order to add the outer
> this field in a ClassSymbol.
The overloading on Symbol/MethodSymbol is  very hard to parse - i.e. 
it's hard to tell whether a client would call one or the other. What I'm 
suggesting is that, since both methods seem to share 99% of the code, 
you add the extra logic to the old method guarded by a check (which I 
think is sym.kind == MTH - i.e. if the symbl is a method).

Maurizio