Review request for JDK-8014230: Compilation incorrectly succeeds with inner class constructor with 254 parameters
Eric McCorkle
eric.mccorkle at oracle.com
Wed Jun 26 13:06:53 PDT 2013
Thanks Jon
On 06/26/13 15:36, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Good to go!
>
> -- Jon
>
> On 06/25/2013 07:03 AM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>> Are there any more comments on this one, or is it good to go?
>>
>> On 06/20/13 14:38, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>>> Thank you for the suggestions, Alex. I have applied all except the
>>> change to "threshold". I named it as such because the test asserts that
>>> methods with "threshold" arguments should pass, but ones with
>>> "threshold" + 1 should fail. It seems to exactly describe the meaning.
>>>
>>> A new webrev has been posted:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~emc/8014230/
>>>
>>> Also, there are several successful JPRT runs (minus a known issue).
>>>
>>> Since Jon made comments earlier, I would like to hear from him before I
>>> commit.
>>>
>>> On 06/19/13 17:57, Alex Buckley wrote:
>>>> - There is less coverage because NumArgs1/2 tested instance and static
>>>> methods while the new MethodArgs only tests instance methods.
>>>>
>>>> - There is no such thing as a static inner class. An inner class is
>>>> non-static by definition (JLS7 8.1.3). The term StaticInnerClass should
>>>> be replaced with StaticNestedClass throughout.
>>>>
>>>> - For grouping purposes, it would be good to prefix ConstructorArgs and
>>>> MethodArgs with "ToplevelClass". Later, we'll have an "AnonClass"
>>>> prefix
>>>> too.
>>>>
>>>> - Might rename threshold to maxArgs in NumArgs. (Is a threshold
>>>> something you can step up to but not on, or something you can step on?)
>>>>
>>>> - Might rename retty ("return type") to result, since the field can
>>>> store "void" and void is not a [return] type (JLS7 8.4.5)
>>>>
>>>> - Might rename ClassNestingDef to NestedClassBuilder.
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 6/19/2013 12:08 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>>>>> Added a new constructor to Main that allows tests to pass in their own
>>>>> Log, facilitating much more precise tests of what errors the compilers
>>>>> generates.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also rolled all the arg limit tests into a general framework.
>>>>>
>>>>> Webrev is here:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~emc/8014230/
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/14/13 16:30, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>>>>>> There are two solutions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For a one-off test, the standard technique is to use a golden file
>>>>>> in conjunctions with rawDiagnostics. The combination is
>>>>>> "somewhat frail" but nowhere near "incredibly frail". The technique
>>>>>> has served us well for many years now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are driving javac through the Compiler API, you can register
>>>>>> a DiagnosticListener, and verify the characteristics of the
>>>>>> Diagnostic
>>>>>> objects passed to report.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Jon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/14/2013 01:14 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>>>>>>> Is there a more convenient API for checking error messages? Golden
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> make for an incredibly frail test, I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/14/13 15:46, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>>>>>>>> The change to Gen looks OK, but the tests look weak. At a
>>>>>>>> minimum, I
>>>>>>>> would expect to see the test check the validity of the error
>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>> that is generated; even better would be to generate the test
>>>>>>>> cases on
>>>>>>>> the fly.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Jon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 06/14/2013 11:29 AM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please review this patch, which addresses a problem with javac not
>>>>>>>>> taking inner this parameters into account when determining if
>>>>>>>>> there are
>>>>>>>>> too many parameters to a function.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The webrev is here:
>>>>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~emc/8014230/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The bug report is here:
>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8014230
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Eric
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: eric_mccorkle.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 314 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20130626/3e3e82bb/eric_mccorkle.vcf
More information about the compiler-dev
mailing list