compilation fails with 'no enclosing instance' error

Liam Miller-Cushon cushon at google.com
Fri Mar 14 18:41:41 UTC 2014


Hi Vicente,

That's great, thanks for the quick fix.

Liam


On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar <
vicente.romero at oracle.com> wrote:

>  Hi Liam,
>
> The bug you reported has already been fixed in version 9.
>
> Thanks again for the bug report,
>
> Vicente
>
> changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/langtools/rev/bd152504a538
> original bug report: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034924
> backport v9: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035432
>
>
> On 27/02/14 21:29, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar wrote:
>
> On 27/02/14 21:14, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
>
> Got it, thanks for taking the time to explain.
>
>
> np, and thanks to you. You was right that the problem was there which made
> the search much easier.
>
> Vicente
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Vicente-Arturo Romero-Zaldivar <
> vicente.romero at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>>   On 27/02/14 17:23, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
>>
>>   Well hiddenIn() is not used for methods only, also fields are
>>> considered.
>>>
>>
>>  So hiddenIn() should search along the path from the class to the
>> member's owner, and at each step search the superinterfaces of the current
>> class? I think the only change from the current implementation would be
>> terminating the search after reaching the owner.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>> Liam
>>
>>  Yes that's the idea of the patch I'm working on and that's why I
>> suggested that this was the reason of the problem :) As a side effect we
>> may have some performance improvement.
>>
>> Vicente
>>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/attachments/20140314/ef2f88c4/attachment.html>


More information about the compiler-dev mailing list