JDK-8153362: [jigsaw] Add javac -Xlint warning to list exposed types which are not accessible

[Mandy Chung]

I agree JSObject.getWindow(Applet) should have forRemoval=true, as I raised in awt-dev thread.  The confusion there was when the API marked forRemoval=true in JDK 9 and when it should really be removed.

Mandy 

> On Jun 13, 2016, at 12:53 PM, Philip Race <philip.race at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Alan,
> 
> See the comment here : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2016-June/011478.html
> 
> Probably you should chime in directly on that discussion with such input ..
> 
> -phil.
> 
> On 6/13/16, 12:47 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 13/06/2016 20:26, Philip Race wrote:
>>> PS .. also you probably should  just suppress lint on the jdk.jsobject module
>>> 
>>> The change you propose to JSObject is going to cause a potential conflict
>>> with the ongoing review discussion about this here :-
>>> 
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/awt-dev/2016-June/011472.html
>> Speaking of, shouldn't this have forRemoval=true? The reason that jdk.jsobject doesn't `requires public java.desktop` is because we expect getWindow(Applet) will eventually be removed and we don't want to trip up those that might be relying on it to access APIs exported by java.desktop.
>> 
>> -Alan