RFR 8189708: class reading issue with named and annotated parameters

[Jan Lahoda]

Sorry for late reply.

Seems OK to me, only:
-the tests should be in:
test/langtools/tools/javac/MethodParameters/8189708
not in:
test/tools/javac/MethodParameters/8189708

-test/tools/javac/MethodParameters/8189708/Test.java has a weird license 
header

Vicente, could you please take a look as well?

Thanks,
     Jan

On 4.12.2017 22:37, Liam Miller-Cushon wrote:
> Hi, is there any more feedback on this?
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Liam Miller-Cushon <cushon at google.com
> <mailto:cushon at google.com>> wrote:
>
>     Here's an updated patch that incorporates your approach:
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cushon/8007720/webrev.01/
>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~cushon/8007720/webrev.01/>
>
>     I included the fix for JDK-8177486 so I could test the inner class /
>     enum constructor case. If this looks like it's on the right track
>     I'll move that part (and the corresponding tests) back into a
>     separate change.
>
>     On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Liam Miller-Cushon
>     <cushon at google.com <mailto:cushon at google.com>> wrote:
>
>         Thanks for the comments,
>
>         On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Jan Lahoda
>         <jan.lahoda at oracle.com <mailto:jan.lahoda at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>             -what happens if there are both runtime invisible and
>             visible annotations of method's parameters? Seems those that
>             appear later will overwrite those that appear sooner?
>
>
>         Oops, thanks. The way your patch handles that looks good to me.
>
>             -the MethodSymbol.savedParameterAnnotations is only used
>             during reading inside the ClassReader, right? It seems
>             wasteful to have it as a field on each MethodSymbol, better
>             would be a field in ClassReader.
>
>
>         Sounds good. I'll try to avoid having savedParameterNames as a
>         field in MethodSymbol also. Do you remember if you encountered
>         any issues with that in your patch?
>
>             -please check what happens for annotations on constructors
>             of enums/non-static innerclasses
>
>
>         Will do. (Also, note that there appears to be an issue with
>         reading MethodParameters on constructors of enums/non-static
>         inner classes: JDK-8177486)
>
>
>