Bug: no line number for invokedynamic

[B. Blaser]

This is also somewhat related to JDK-8019486 associated test which
should probably be updated as next if we want to re-enable this
feature to have a clean stack trace.

Cheers,
Bernard


diff -r b3a833c9c6e9
test/langtools/tools/javac/T8019486/WrongLNTForLambdaTest.java
--- a/test/langtools/tools/javac/T8019486/WrongLNTForLambdaTest.java
 Mon Feb 12 09:12:41 2018 +0100
+++ b/test/langtools/tools/javac/T8019486/WrongLNTForLambdaTest.java
 Wed Feb 14 22:56:43 2018 +0100
@@ -107,6 +107,8 @@
     static final int[][] deserializeExpectedLNT = {
     //  {line-number, start-pc},
         {05,           0},       //number -> number / 1
+        {21,           137},     //number -> number / 1
+        {05,           142},     //number -> number / 1
     };

     static final int[][] lambdaBridgeExpectedLNT = {
@@ -123,6 +125,8 @@
     static final int[][] callExpectedLNT = {
     //  {line-number, start-pc},
         {29,           0},       //number -> number / 1
+        {30,           2},       //number -> number / 1
+        {29,           7},       //number -> number / 1
         {31,           10},       //number -> number / 1
     };


On 14 February 2018 at 21:47, Maurizio Cimadamore
<maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com> wrote:
> This comes from here:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8010404
>
> Back when developing JDK 8 - we had a feeling that having the debugger stop
> at lambda capture sites would be confusing - and so we disabled it.
>
> I agree that in the stack trace case this decision seems to backfire a bit.
>
> Maurizio
>
>
>
> On 14/02/18 15:26, B. Blaser wrote:
>>
>> The line number is deliberately not emitted for dynamic callsites (but
>> I don't know why?), see below.
>> I hope this helps,
>> Bernard
>>
>> diff -r b3a833c9c6e9
>> src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/jvm/Gen.java
>> --- a/src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/jvm/Gen.java
>>    Mon Feb 12 09:12:41 2018 +0100
>> +++ b/src/jdk.compiler/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/jvm/Gen.java
>>    Wed Feb 14 16:14:17 2018 +0100
>> @@ -1649,9 +1649,9 @@
>>           MethodSymbol msym = (MethodSymbol)TreeInfo.symbol(tree.meth);
>>           genArgs(tree.args,
>>                   msym.externalType(types).getParameterTypes());
>> -        if (!msym.isDynamic()) {
>> +//        if (!msym.isDynamic()) {
>>               code.statBegin(tree.pos);
>> -        }
>> +//        }
>>           result = m.invoke();
>>       }
>>
>>
>> On 14 February 2018 at 09:16, Vladimir Parfinenko
>> <vparfinenko at excelsior-usa.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I think I have found a minor bug. There is no line number information
>>> for invokedynamic instructions generated for method handle or lambda
>>> function.
>>>
>>> The problem can be reproduced using the example below and running it
>>> like this:
>>>
>>>    $ javac Test.java
>>>    $ rm A.class
>>>    $ java Test
>>>    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: A
>>>            at Test.main(Test.java:6)
>>>    Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: A
>>>            ...
>>>
>>> The correct line number for this stack trace element would be 7.
>>>
>>> The line number table is missing an entry for invokedynamic:
>>>
>>>      Code:
>>>        stack=2, locals=2, args_size=1
>>>           0: invokestatic  #2                  // Method fortyTwo:()I
>>>           3: invokedynamic #3,  0              // InvokeDynamic
>>> #0:apply:()Ljava/util/function/Function;
>>>           8: invokestatic  #4                  // Method
>>> foo:(ILjava/util/function/Function;)Ljava/lang/Object;
>>>          11: astore_1
>>>          12: return
>>>        LineNumberTable:
>>>          line 6: 0
>>>          line 5: 8
>>>          line 9: 12
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Vladimir Parfinenko
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Test.java
>>>
>>> // line 1
>>> public class Test {
>>>      public static void main(String[] args) {
>>>          Object res =
>>>              foo(
>>>                      fortyTwo(), // line 6
>>>                      A::sqr      // line 7
>>>              );
>>>      }
>>>
>>>      public static Object foo(int x, java.util.function.Function<Integer,
>>> Integer> f) {
>>>          return null;
>>>      }
>>>
>>>      public static int fortyTwo() {
>>>          return 42;
>>>      }
>>> }
>>>
>>> class A {
>>>      public static int sqr(int x) {
>>>          return x * x;
>>>      }
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>